The UK passes the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill, allowing authorities to seize digital assets under court orders to combat fraud.
- The UK has passed the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill, granting authorities the ability to seize digital assets.
- Amendments to existing legislation, like the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, now include provisions for digital assets.
- Courts can issue orders for seizing digital assets on exchanges hosting wallets linked to criminal activities.
- The bill introduces the offense of “failure to prevent fraud,” holding large organizations accountable for fraud committed by their staff.
The United Kingdom has taken a significant step in combating digital asset-related fraud with the passing of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill. This legislation equips UK authorities with the legal tools to seize digital assets through court orders.
The bill introduces amendments to various existing acts, with a focus on integrating digital asset-related definitions and mechanisms into the legal framework. One of the most notable changes is to the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, enabling authorities to obtain court restraining orders for seizing property, particularly digital assets.
UK passes new law to empower authorities to seize digital assets https://t.co/4Vs05wgmV4
— CoinGeek (@RealCoinGeek) October 31, 2023
What sets this legislation apart is its acknowledgment of the complexities surrounding digital assets. Authorities can now directly approach courts to request orders related to digital asset exchanges hosting wallets containing illicit digital assets. This includes the ability to demand exchanges liquidate assets subject to freezing orders, especially when there is a concern about the assets’ value fluctuating in the near future.
The bill also addresses scenarios involving competing ownership claims over digital assets, mandating that courts verify ownership before ordering exchanges to liquidate them.
Furthermore, the act introduces the offense of “failure to prevent fraud,” making large organizations criminally liable if they benefit from fraudulent activities committed by their employees. This provision could become a potent tool for authorities to hold non-compliant exchanges accountable, especially in cases involving internal fraud.
Surety For The Users
Home Secretary Suella Braverman expressed commitment to preventing criminals from profiting from their illegal activities, emphasizing the act’s role in aiding law enforcement efforts against such tactics.
Grame Biggar, director general of the U.K.’s National Crime Agency, welcomed the act, highlighting its potential to combat money laundering and the abuse of U.K. company structures by criminals and corrupt elites.
The act, initially introduced in September 2022, marks a significant move by the government to combat digital asset-related crimes. It underscores the global recognition that digital assets are subject to the same legal framework as any other asset, emphasizing the importance of law over the possession of keys.
This development could also have implications for a landmark U.K. case expected to go to trial in 2024, where it is argued that blockchain developers have legal duties to restore access to stolen or lost digital assets.
The passing of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill in the UK reflects a growing trend among governments worldwide to regulate and enforce laws surrounding digital assets. This legislation sends a clear message that the legal landscape for digital assets is evolving rapidly, and it is essential for stakeholders to comply with existing regulations.
The introduction of the “failure to prevent fraud” offense highlights the government’s determination to hold organizations accountable for fraudulent activities within their ranks. This should serve as a strong incentive for digital asset exchanges and companies to establish robust internal controls and compliance measures.
Furthermore, the amendments addressing digital asset nuances demonstrate the government’s commitment to adapting to the changing financial landscape. This adaptability is crucial in ensuring that authorities can effectively combat digital asset-related crimes and protect investors and the integrity of the financial system.
The upcoming U.K. trial involving blockchain developers and digital asset ownership will be closely watched, as it could set a precedent for future legal disputes in the digital asset space. Overall, the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill represents a significant step toward a more regulated and secure digital asset ecosystem in the UK.